Isabel Hull’s analysis of international law during World War I is a welcome and valuable contribution to an emerging body of scholarship on the laws of war. This is not to undercut its place in the historiography of World War I. Hull rightly points out that most histories of the war have tended to gloss over or even dismiss the role of international law in the war. Hull corrects this bias by delving into British, French, and particularly German archives to show that international law was very much on the minds of all parties to the conflict. Indeed, she argues that preserving the existing structure of international law was a major reason for the outbreak of war.
Hull’s main argument is that views of international law varied across belligerents. The primary fault line lay between Germany and everyone else. The British, French, and Americans argued constantly about the rights of neutrals, obligations of occupying parties, and legal limits on how prisoners of war could be treated. The Germans, argues Hull, interpreted international law in view of military necessity; law was meant to serve belligerents, and could certainly be trumped in the face of the demands of war. And contrary to the logic that it is weak states that favor int
To continue reading, see options above.
Producing Security: Multinational Corporations, Globalization, and the
Changing Calculus of Conflict, Stephen G. Brooks
Reviewed by Tanisha M. Fazal
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Developments in Beijing
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
CONTINUING ISSUES IN U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY
Articles | Book reviews
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.