pp. 894-896

Voters’ Verdicts: Citizens, Campaigns, and Institutions in State Supreme Court Elections, Chris W. Bonneau and Damon M. Cann

Reviewed by Scott A. Comparato

BUY

   Facebook

   Twitter

   E-mail
 

The last 20 years have seen tremendous changes in the importance of state supreme courts. These courts are increasingly at the forefront of legal and policy change, which has led to increased attention to the methods by which justices on these courts are chosen. Many policymakers and scholars have argued that the method by which state supreme court justices are elected has profound implications for the qualifications and judgment of the individuals on these courts and the decisions they hand down.

In Voters’ Verdicts: Citizens, Campaigns, and Institutions in State Supreme Court Elections, Chris W. Bonneau and Damon M. Cann explore the effects that cues related to judicial candidates have on voters in states with different judicial selection methods. The authors argue that in addition to differences in selection methods, recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court involving judicial campaign speech, judicial recusal, campaign finance, and public financing of elections have fundamentally altered the conditions in which state judicial elections are taking place, necessitating a closer look at these institutions. In addition to these changes, campaign spending in state supreme court elections has increased dramatically in the last 20 years. Bonneau and Cann explore the impact of these changes in the landscape of state supreme court elections using dat

To continue reading, see options above.

About PSQ's Editor

Demetrios James Caraley

Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.

From the Archives

North Korea

North Korea's Weapons of Mass Destruction: Badges, Shields, or Swords?

Victor D. Cha examines the question about relative merits of engaging or containing North Korea.

MORE ABOUT THIS TOPIC

Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

New APS Book

Continuing Issues in U.S. National Security Policy   CONTINUING ISSUES IN U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected
newsstand locator
About APS