pp. 547-578
The Influence of Magna Carta in Limiting Executive Power in the War on Terror
Eric T. Kasper examines the use of Magna Carta by U.S. federal courts in enemy combatant cases. He traces the history of due process, jury trial, and habeas corpus rights within Magna Carta as well as subsequent legal documents and rulings in England and America. He concludes that Magna Carta is properly used by the federal courts as persuasive authority to limit executive power in the war on terror.
Fear and the First Amendment: Controversial Cases of the Roberts Court, Craig R. Smith Reviewed by Eric T. Kasper
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
APS Forum | Book Talk - The Insiders' Game: How Elites Make War and Peace
June 22, 2026
WEBINAR
CONTRIBUTIONS TO POLITICAL SCIENCE
Governing by Decree: The Trump Presidency and the Decline of “Legislating Together”
Desmond King
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson
view additional issuesArticles | Book reviews
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.