War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority, Mariah Zeisberg
For those who suppose the Constitution smoothly and efficiently settles disputes among the branches—like the storied “machine that would go of itself”—the war power has always proven a vexing exception. The text is vague, the history inconclusive, and the practice contested. While this state of affairs has not kept scholars from advancing one claim or another on the “correct” allocation of power between the executive and legislative branches, it has (and always will) prevent one school of thought from achieving conclusive dominance over all others. Faced with this, some scholars have argued that disputes about the war power are essentially political and cannot be intelligently analyzed using traditional legal tools—a view I generally share.
But in an ambitious new book, University of Michigan political scientist Mariah Zeisberg takes a different view. In War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority, Zeisberg carefully unpacks the language and structure of the Constitution and combines this analysis with a nuanced appraisal of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the executive and legislative branches visa-vis the war power (their respective “governance capacities” [p. 26] to develop ostensibly neutral “pro
To continue reading, see options above.
Long Wars and the Constitution, Stephen M. Griffin Reviewed by JOSEPH MARGULIES
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
North Korea and the West
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
CONTINUING ISSUES IN U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY
Articles | Book reviews
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.