That political and income inequality is increasing is not surprising to political scientists, yet Christopher Ellis brings a unique perspective to this discussion, arguing that local contexts matter in understanding the causes and consequences of political inequality. How Americans think about inequality is mediated by their local socioeconomic and political context. Therefore, a poor person who lives in a relatively more affluent location will feel differently about government and how well represented he or she is than a poor person who lives in an area of concentrated poverty. Through an extensive literature review, surveys, quantitative analyses, and illustrative maps, Ellis challenges readers to think about the heterogeneity of inequality in the United States in Putting Inequality in Context: Class, Public Opinion, and Representation in the United States.
Ellis answers the question of why low-income people do not act politically to reduce income inequality by contending that while people may not understand national trends, they are aware of their local context. He defines local context as the lived “personal experiences–with the laws and customs of a given area, in formal and informal social interactions with people, and in observations of how people conduct themselves” (p. 13). This local context matters for political and civic p
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Presidential Power and Impeachment
American Political Institutions after Watergate--A Discussion
DEMETRIOS CARALEY, CHARLES V. HAMILTON, ALPHEUS T. MASON, ROBERT A. McCAUGHEY, NELSON W. POLSBY, JEFFREY L. PRESSMAN, ARTHUR M. SCHLESINGER, JR., GEORGE L. SHERRY, AND TOM WICKER
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
THE PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS: EXTENDING THE U.S. UMBRELLA AND INCREASING CHANCES OF WAR
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.