How does policy surrounding equal rights develop, and what role do courts play in this development? This book argues that legal development is due to a discourse between high courts and elected officials, whereby courts offer a legal interpretation and elected officials signal their acceptance or rejection of that interpretation. This book seeks to explain seemingly contradictory or inconsistent court judgments through a “deliberative partnership” theory that focuses on the discourse between judges and aligned elected officials (p. 223). Stephan Stohler’s Reconstructing Rights: Courts, Parties, and Equality Rights in India, South Africa, and the United States offers qualitative case studies based upon judicial opinions, legislative debates, and legal briefs, showing how high courts often initiate legal development yet revise their interpretations when elected officials reject their legal innovation.
For example, U.S. litigation following the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) pushed the Supreme Court to determine evidentiary standards for vote dilution lawsuits. Congress had not provided clear guidance, so Justice Byron White introduced a new doctrine that compromised between the previously established discriminatory intent and discriminatory effect doctrines. Progre
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Social Policy and Political Institutions
American Political Institutions after Watergate--A Discussion
DEMETRIOS CARALEY, CHARLES V. HAMILTON, ALPHEUS T. MASON, ROBERT A. McCAUGHEY, NELSON W. POLSBY, JEFFREY L. PRESSMAN, ARTHUR M. SCHLESINGER, JR., GEORGE L. SHERRY, AND TOM WICKER
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.