Many scholars have carefully parsed the words that emerge from presidents’ mouths, but few have provided a detailed investigation of, say, the significance of Ronald Reagan’s preference for contractions or the weighty implications of Barack Obama deeming Iraq a “dumb” war rather than a “stupid” one. These examples are just a small piece of John Wilson’s project in Talking with the President: The Pragmatics of Presidential Language to apply pragmatics, or “the analysis and description of meaning construction in social contexts of interaction” (p. 3), to the presidential language of John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Reagan, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama. The book is noteworthy not only for this innovative approach to the study of presidential rhetoric but also for the ways Wilson skillfully integrates findings from linguistics, political science, the law, literary studies, psychology, and philosophy (among other fields) to provide a rich and interdisciplinary account of why individual presidents speak the way they do and the reactions that such talk provokes in those who hear it. The text is highly readable, at times interlacing presidents’ words with examples of how we make similar language choices in our everyday lives to clarify or obscure meaning (or, in US Weekly parlance, “Presiden
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
On Democracy: Remembering Demetrios James Caraley
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRACY
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.