pp. 186-187

The Polythink Syndrome: U.S. Foreign Policy Decisions on 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, and ISIS, Alex Mintz and Carly Wayne

Reviewed by David Patrick Houghton

BUY

   Facebook

   Twitter

   E-mail
 

This book provides an excellent counterbalance to studies that focus exclusively on “groupthink.” That term—which denotes a collective rush to judgment and an unwillingness to revisit other options once an alternative has been reached within a decision-making group—is now so accepted by practitioners and scholars that it is routinely used by prime ministers and presidents (see, for instance, David Cameron’s House of Commons speech in the immediate aftermath of the July 2016 Chilcote Report on British involvement in Iraq, or the much earlier U.S. report into September 11, 2001). What the authors term “polythink” is essentially the polar opposite of this: rather than denoting mass agreement, it refers to the fragmentation and paralysis that can beset any decision-making group. Whereas groupthink verges on total agreement among the inner circle of advisers, polythink focuses on the fault lines within an administration that can also bedevil its decision making. Using a range of examples drawn from the U.S. government’s response to September 11, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, and Syria, the authors convincingly show that polythink is just as prevalent as groupthink and that it can lead to a host of policymaking difficulties and undesirable outcomes.

The Polythink Syndrome provides a very welcome and innovative antid

To continue reading, see options above.

About PSQ's Editor

Demetrios James Caraley

Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.

From the Archives

Developments in Beijing

The Varieties of Collective Financial Statecraft: The BRICS and China
LESLIE ELLIOTT ARMIJO

Chinese Thinking on the South China Sea and the Future of Regional Security
FENG ZHANG

Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

EARLY VIEW

Coming in Winter 2017-18

Disruption, Demonization, Deliverance, and Norm Destruction: The Rhetorical Signature of Donald J. Trump

KATHLEEN HALL JAMIESON and DORON TAUSSIG examine Donald Trump’s rhetoric during the presidential campaign and through his first 100 days in office. They argue that Trump’s “rhetorical signature,” which distinguishes him from his predecessors, certified Trump’s authenticity as a candidate of change and now complicate his ability to govern.

VIEW THE ARTICLE

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

New APS Book

Continuing Issues in U.S. National Security Policy   CONTINUING ISSUES IN U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected
newsstand locator
About APS