While Americans are obsessed with their Constitution’shistory,theyhavea hard time thinking about their Constitution historically. Constitutional Myths is less concerned with substantive misunderstandings than with meta‐myths involving ahistorical appeals to the Founding. While framed as a debunking, the book packs an affirmative punch, arguing that there is no inconsistency between taking the Founding as a touchstone and a strong activist government commitment to working pragmatically to meet the challenges of its time.
After lamenting that today the Constitution is being used to divide rather than unite, the author sets out to explain what the Founders did in their own eyes and how and why later generations have disregarded that to forge a succession of “phantom constitutions” (p. xiii). Recently, eight myths have served: 1) the Framers opposed a strong federal government; 2) the Framers hated taxes; 3) the Framers were impartial statesmen, above interest‐driven politics; 4) the Framers were guided by clear principles of limited government; 5) James Madison sired the Constitution; 6) The Federalist Papers tell us what the Constitution really means; 7) the Founders gave us the Bill of Rights; and 8) we can determine how specific provisions of the Constitution should be applied today by discovering their original intent or meaning. In each chap
To continue reading, see options above.
Political Peoplehood: The Role of Values, Interests, and Identities, Rogers M. Smith Reviewed by Ken I. Kersch
The Supreme Court and the American Elite, 1789–2008, Lucas A. Powe, Jr. Reviewed by Ken I. Kersch
Welfare and the Constitution, Sotirios A. Barber Reviewed by Ken I. Kersch
Full Faith and Credit for Same-Sex Marriages?, Ken I. Kersch
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Developments in Beijing
CONTINUING ISSUES IN U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY
Articles | Book reviews