Citizens, politicians, and journalists alike enjoy decrying political incivility. Diana C. Mutz complicates these attacks on incivility by investigating the effects of in-your-face politics. In-your-face political television includes two attributes: it contains incivility, that is, violations of face-to-face interaction norms, and it violates norms of interpersonal social distance by including close-up shots that make a televised person appear physically close to the viewer. Mutz’s thorough analysis suggests that in-your-face television, while damaging to citizens, also is more arousing and entertaining than civil political television.
Mutz investigates the effects of in-your-face politics using a convincing multimethod approach. A series of tightly constructed lab experiments provide causal evidence that in-your-face political talk shows with both incivility and close-up camera shots increase physiological arousal, entertainment value of the show, and open-ended recall of political candidate issue positions. However, people who watched in-your-face television believed that the arguments made by candidates they opposed were less legitimate than people who saw other types of televised political interactions. Further, incivility alone—even without close-up camera shots—decreased individuals’ levels of political trust. Mutz tests the extern
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Voting and the Electorate
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRACY
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.