In this well-researched investigation of the origins and evolution of the U.S. electoral system, Jay K. Dow offers a defense of single-member districts (SMDs) in the House of Representatives. The book begins with a discussion of the ideas that animated the framing of the U.S. constitution. Dow follows fundamental disagreements between “Federalists” and “Anti-Federalists” over the nature of civic virtue, the public good, and tyranny to show how these distinct perspectives informed the design of representation in the House of Representatives. The Federalists, who were largely coastal elites, saw the House as a place for debating ideas among well-educated men who were capable of putting self-interest aside for the common good. As such, Federalists preferred larger, more diverse districts, where voters could choose from a larger pool of well-qualified candidates and elected officials would govern as trustees. In contrast, the Anti-Federalists viewed the House as a place for “the balancing and reconciliation” of conflicts of interests (p. 18) and saw representatives as delegates who served the interests of their constituencies. Ideally, districts would be smaller and more homogeneous, so that representatives would be intimately knowledgeable of their districts and their constituents’ interests and citizens could hold unresponsive repre
To continue reading, see options above.
Rejecting Compromise: Legislators’ Fear of Primary Voters, Sarah E. Anderson, Daniel M. Butler and Laurel Harbridge-Yong Reviewed by Alex Keena
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
The Powell Doctrine
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.