Rising Powers and Foreign Policy Revisionism: Understanding BRICS Identity and Behavior through Time, Cameron G. Thies and Mark David Nieman
This project contributes to the extensive analysis regarding the consequences of emerging powers by focusing on the roles that Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) play regionally and globally. The authors do so by comparing theoretical approaches and then conducting mixed-methods testing to examine whether the BRICS thus far have displayed conflictual behavior (military and economic). The book is rich in both theoretical development and empirical testing. Along with the results, it makes a valuable contribution to the literature.
As the international system evolves, international relations scholars continually ask themselves to explain whether emerging powers have the potential to increase the likelihood of major-power conflict. The authors first take into consideration the materialist hypothesis: as states’ relative powers increase, they become more conflictual. They then include another dimension, developed from role theory, regarding how the socialization of emerging powers into the group of great powers could dampen the likelihood of conflict. The new “foreign policy hypothesis” states that BRICS adapt their individual foreign policies through social pressure from great powers, thus reducing the likelihood of conflict.
The theory construction is the latest way to understand how status quo satisfaction (SQS) is
To continue reading, see options above.
The European Commission and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Europe’s Custodians, Antonis A. Ellinas and Ezra Suleiman Reviewed by Gaspare M. Genna
Europe United: Power Politics and the Making of the European Community, Sebastian Rosato Reviewed by Gaspare M. Genna
Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism, Amitav Acharya Reviewed by Gaspare M. Genna
Intimate Ties, Bitter Struggles: The United States and Latin America Since 1945, Alan L. McPherson Reviewed by Gaspare M. Genna
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Social Policy and Political Institutions
American Political Institutions after Watergate--A Discussion
DEMETRIOS CARALEY, CHARLES V. HAMILTON, ALPHEUS T. MASON, ROBERT A. McCAUGHEY, NELSON W. POLSBY, JEFFREY L. PRESSMAN, ARTHUR M. SCHLESINGER, JR., GEORGE L. SHERRY, AND TOM WICKER
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.