Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy, Michael Albertus and Victor Menaldo
Most observers believe that democracy brings important socioeconomic and political improvements for the broader citizenry. Empirical evidence, however, has been surprisingly mixed. Michael Albertus and Victor Menaldo offer a provocative explanation. They claim that many democracies are thoroughly “elite biased” from the outset, hemmed in by constitutions engineered by the political and economic elites of preceding authoritarian regimes to safeguard their interests. To consent to democratization, these powerful sectors limit popular participation and impose constraints on the government. Because these crippled democracies are deficient in political vibrancy and fail to represent the median voter's interests in their policymaking, they achieve little, if any, socioeconomic redistribution and fail to punish outgoing autocrats for their misdeeds.
According to Albertus and Menaldo, democracy can only flourish fully when authoritarian elites face popular challenges, such as “revolutionary” mass mobilization, while lacking the institutional strength and coordination mechanisms to impose a constitutional straightjacket on the emerging democracy. Under these circumstances, “popular democracies” arise, which do effect substantial redistribution and sanction the old dictators.
As the authors attribute great power to autho
To continue reading, see options above.
Constraining Dictatorship: From Personalized Rule to Institutionalized Regimes, Anne Meng Reviewed by KURT WEYLAND
Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America, Eduardo Silva Reviewed by KURT WEYLAND
Rethinking Venezuelan Politics: Class, Conflict, and the Chávez Phenomenon, Steve Ellner Reviewed by KURT WEYLANDmore by this author
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Women's History Month
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.