Share this
PREVIOUS ARTICLE ALL CONTENTS Next ARTICLE

Humanitarian Hypocrisy: Civilian Protection and the Design of Peace Operations, Andrea L. Everett

Reviewed by Alan J. Kuperman

BUY

 

Intervention to protect endangered noncombatants during civil war is a frustrating enterprise. Sometimes no one intervenes. Or they are too late. Or extremely limited. Or the intervention backfires. Or after the interveners leave, the conflict reignites.

In her recent book, Andrea L. Everett focuses on another problem: when the details of an intervention imperfectly match what is needed. She labels this the “ambitions-resources” gap. Either the devoted resources are inadequate for the stated ambitions, or the ambitions are too modest considering the resources provided.

The book offers a plausible, if unsurprising, theory for this phenomenon: potential interveners sometimes feel pressure from bureaucrats or the public to take action, yet are concerned about potential dangers, so they employ risk-averse half-measures. Everett offers compelling quantitative evidence that half-hearted action is more likely when there is a combination of high pressure to intervene but an inhospitable conflict environment.

She then provides several case studies of such intervention—France in Rwanda, NATO in Kosovo, U.S.-supported African troops in Darfur—that confirm her theory. She juxtaposes these with two contrasting decisions by Australia in Indonesian civil conflicts—full-blown intervention in East Timor, but no action in Aceh&

To continue reading, see options above.

More by This Author

About PSQ's Editor

ROBERT Y. SHAPIRO

Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.

CONFERENCES & EVENTS

WEBINAR
Jeh Johnson - On the State of American Democracy

October 14, 2021

MORE ABOUT THIS EVENT VIEW ALL EVENTS

Editor’s spotlight

Social Policy and Political Institutions

The Dual Agenda of African American Organizations since the New Deal: Social Welfare Policies and Civil Rights
Dona Cooper Hamilton and Charles V. Hamilton

American Political Institutions after Watergate--A Discussion
DEMETRIOS CARALEY, CHARLES V. HAMILTON, ALPHEUS T. MASON, ROBERT A. McCAUGHEY, NELSON W. POLSBY, JEFFREY L. PRESSMAN, ARTHUR M. SCHLESINGER, JR., GEORGE L. SHERRY, AND TOM WICKER

MORE ABOUT THIS TOPIC

Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

New APS Book

Perspectives on Presidential Elections, 1992–2020   PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected

newsstand locator
About APS