Conspiracies of Conspiracies: How Delusions Have Overrun America, Thomas Milan Konda
How did it come to this? Time was when the lunatic fringe was on the fringe. Politicians, scientists, and network anchors told us things, and we believed them. Democracy usually worked as advertised. Now, the lunatics are running the asylum, possibly into the ground. Conspiracy theories are breeding and seething like a zombie apocalypse, scaling the battlements of civilization with their countless corpses and bottomless hunger for brains. “Conspiracism has reached such a point of prominence today that we must ask whether it is about to destroy democracy and civil society,” (p. 12) warns Thomas Konda.
Konda’s central question is this: “Americans see hoaxes and plots everywhere…. why?” (p. 1). Yet the book is really about “how” questions. The focus of the work is “conspiracism—a mental framework, a belief system, a worldview that leads people to look for conspiracies, to anticipate them, to link them into a grander overarching conspiracy” (p. 2). Konda’s explanation is that modern conspiracism dates back to the French Revolution; it developed in fits and starts during the nineteenth century, mostly in the United States, “gained a permanent foothold in the public consciousness first as an anti-Semitic conspiracy, then as a global-Communist-new world order conspiracy” (p. 12), and went mainstream following the election of Barack Obama, especially after the 2016 presidential election. That is how it came to this.
Before returning to the “why,” we should talk about the “whether”: whether or not the “how” is true. Konda may be right, but, like the conspiracy theories he studies, it is often hard to tell. To be fair, the work is not a conspiracy theory; it is a just-so story. Konda draws on psychology, history, and conspiracist writings, but logics and counterlogics are not laid out or empirically assessed. One event jumps to another, culminating in the present. Religion, growth rates, social change, trust, technology, politics, immigration, and theoretical improvisation, all appear as stepping stones that cluster fortuitously in the river of time. But there is no clear measure of conspiracism, or any of the foregoing factors, to determine what is causing what. Polling data, official statistics, content analysis, television ratings, internet traffic, even Google Ngrams are astonishingly absent. If we cannot agree on the whether, the why will have to wait.
Yet the book succeeds anyway. True, it does not show that conspiracism is overrunning America, or why it waxes and wanes, or even that Americans are more prone to it, or that it is a major cause of democratic downfall. Yes, many concepts are ill defined and poorly tracked across time and space. Indeed, not all the facts are straight—for example, Franklin D. Roosevelt did not reject the Morgenthau Plan to deindustrialize Germany (p. 131), and the mid-1970s were not “the beginning of intellectual white supremacism” (p. 138). Nonetheless, in spite of all the biases and blind spots endemic to human creation, Konda’s panoramic book overflows with the weird and wondrous worlds of conspiracy theories and the people that love them.
If Konda’s claims are wrong, they are wrong for the right reasons. They curate a compelling set of factors and facts in ways that encourage young minds to take an interest and do a better job taming a tough topic. Who knows, they may even help stave off the apocalypse.
Democratic Peace: A Political Biography, Piki Ish-Shalom Reviewed by Joseph M. Parent
Europe’s Structural Idol: An American Federalist Republic?, Joseph M. Parent
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Voting and the Electorate
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRACY
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.