How did the American presidency come to be the center of American political life and a symbol of the nation itself? Many accounts of presidential development focus on actions such as George Washington's use of the simple “Mr. President,” or Thomas Jefferson's purchase of Louisiana. In The Man of the People, Nathaniel C. Green takes a broader, and more illuminating, view. Green argues that political dissent—the Jeffersonian Republicans who criticized Washington and John Adams, and the Federalists who in turn criticized Jefferson and his successors—played a crucial, and heretofore underappreciated and unexamined, role in shaping the presidency. The presidency that emerged from these early decades, far from the “chief clerk” role that some envisioned, was, in Green's estimation, a collaboration between early presidents and their political opponents. The back-and-forth between presidents and critics, elite partisans and average citizens alike, shaped not just American politics but standards for evaluating leaders and candidates. It also established an American identity rooted in race, gender, and violent nationalism to which Andrew Jackson found himself uniquely well suited in his campaigns for president.
Green's insight is that the “untrodden ground” (p. 40) on which Washington and his s
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Ukraine, Russia, and the West
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.