Civic education scholarship typically examines how curriculum and pedagogy promote democratic outcomes for students, but it rarely analyzes the implementation process and context of civics reform. Mantas-Kourounis's qualitative study uses policy feedback and advocacy coalition framework literature to argue policy core beliefs produce elite enactment coalitions that encounter roadblocks when their national reforms hit the local level. Local implementors, acting in unique institutional and bureaucratic contexts, ultimately shape policy sustainability and equity.

Mantas-Kourounis begins her comparative case study with federal initiatives of the early twenty-first century. Civics advocates interpreted national marginalization of social studies as a call to action that fostered mobilization among coalitional actors whose reports (e.g., The Civic Mission of Schools [Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, University of Maryland; 2003], Where Did Social Studies Go Wrong [Porter, K., et al. (eds), Thomas B. Fordham Foundation; 2003]) solidified distinct stances on civics. This created a window of policy opportunity leading to the College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) framework and the Civic Education Initiative (CEI). The C3 and CEI represented ideological divergence in the civi