Sam Lebovic's book examines the hazy relationship between press freedoms and the actual execution of the press's democratic mission of providing accurate information so that individuals can be self-governing. The distance between a free press and an idealized responsible, public-serving press has persisted as a murky, difficult-to-navigate realm since the nation's founding. The problem has persisted because the potential components of a solution will not budge from their existing positions. The news media remain part of largely corporate, capitalistic endeavors—thus a conflict of interest between profit and public service remains a constant concern. This conflict is a crucial part of Lebovic's book.
Traditional interpretations of the First Amendment do not allow the government to regulate the press in a way that would compel publishers to be responsible to the people. Also, as Lebovic identifies, the government has its own conflicts of interest when it comes to ensuring that the press fulfills its responsibilities to the public. Governments have a propensity to control the flow of information by attempting to manipulate what journalists report, limit access to sources, and classify documents. How, under such circumstances, can the press be both free and responsible? As Lebovic rightly recognizes from the outset, “The idea of
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
The Atomic Bomb Saved Lives
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRACY
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.