Share this

Why Parties Matter: Political Competition and Democracy in the American South, John H. Aldrich and John D. Griffin

Reviewed by Marty Cohen



When determining whether governments will be responsive to the public, there is a healthy debate as to the role of party competition. There are those who contend that political competition is simply unnecessary for maintaining a healthy democracy. Others go further and argue that it is actually bad for democracy. The authors of this work believe electoral competition that is born of a healthy two-party system forces the government to be responsive to the people. John H. Aldrich and John D. Griffin claim that effective democratic governance arises consistently in the presence of regular party competition for control of governmental offices. Their evidence comes from a fascinating comparison of a predominantly one- or no-party South with a robust two-party North. They compare the two regions during four distinct eras stretching back to the 1830s. The variation both within the South and between the regions affords the authors the opportunity to buttress certain theoretical claims regarding the impact of political competition on healthy democracy.

Their main argument contains four parts. First, democracies govern effectively when they perform well on valence issues and when they represent citizens’ preferences on more controversial issues. Second, regularly competitive elections in which voters can hold elected officials accountable are necessary to induce el

To continue reading, see options above.

About PSQ's Editor


Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.


Jeh Johnson on the State of American Democracy
Click below to read the transcript or watch the recording.


Editor’s spotlight

The Powell Doctrine

The Rise and Fall of Colin Powell and the Powell Doctrine
Walter LaFeber


Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

New APS Book

Perspectives on Presidential Elections, 1992–2020   PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected

newsstand locator
About APS