What types of strategies are secondary powers, such as China and Russia, pursuing to restrain, or at least delegitimate, what they perceive to be aggressive behavior by the United States? Are these strategies fundamentally different from the types of strategies pursued against overly powerful or aggressive great powers in the previous 200 years? Finally, what criteria should we use to determine whether balancing strategies have been “effective” or whether threatened states actually attempted to balance in the first place?
These questions go to the heart of the two-decade-old debate over “soft balancing”—defined as the use of international institutions and the formation of informal alignments and strategic partnerships short of full-fledged alliances with the objective of imposing marginal costs on a great power, or at least delegitimating the threatening use of a great power's economic and military capabilities. In this insightful book, T.V. Paul presents a full-fledged theory of soft balancing and finds empirical support that states have occasionally pursued soft balancing against aggressive great powers over the past two centuries.
Paul argues that soft balancing has four overlapping aims: to impede the target's ability to pr
To continue reading, see options above.
Squandered Opportunity: Neoclassical Realism and Iranian Foreign Policy, Thomas Juneau Reviewed by JEFFREY W. TALIAFERRO
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Women's History Month
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.