The Limits of Party: Congress and Lawmaking in a Polarized Era, James M. Curry and Frances E. Lee
Most accounts of contemporary congressional politics focus on partisan fighting and the breakdown of regular order. The resulting picture for those who want to see deliberation and consensus building, or for those who worry about the majority steamrolling policy over the minority, is quite dim. James M. Curry and Frances E. Lee’s masterful new book offers a more optimistic perspective. In The Limits of Party, they suggest that when it comes to lawmaking, bipartisanship remains common and has changed little over the past 30 years. Moreover, despite exhibiting more cohesion on roll call votes, majority parties are no more likely to enact their core agenda items into law, and the prospects for bipartisanship are similar under regular order and under violations of regular order. Although the process has changed, the outcome has not.
Curry and Lee’s evidence highlights the limits of prominent partisan and preference-based perspectives on legislating. The responsible parties perspective envisioned homogeneous parties enacting their agendas and facing public accountability for their actions. Although contemporary parties meet many of the underlying conditions in dominant partisan models (for example, conditional party government, cartel theory, strategic party government), Curry and Lee show
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
The Powell Doctrine
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.