The Reagan Administration and Coercive Diplomacy: Restraining More Than Remaking Governments
Bruce W. Jentleson analyzes the uses and limitations of a strategy of coercive diplomacy as seen in five principal cases drawn from the Reagan years. He argues that coercive diplomacy is much more effective as a strategy for restraining rather than remaking governments.
Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy: Iraq, 9/11, and Misguided Reform, Paul R. Pillar Reviewed by Bruce W. Jentleson
Lessons in Disaster: McGeorge Bundy and the Path to War in Vietnam, Gordon M. Goldstein Reviewed by Bruce W. Jentleson
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Race and Public Policy
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRACY
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.