The Journal of Public and International Affairs
Published since 1886 by the Academy of Political Science
Archive Search
Advanced Options
pp. 351-377
Why the Bush Doctrine Cannot Be Sustained
Robert Jervis argues that despite some successes, the Bush Doctrine cannot be sustained because it has many internal contradictions, requires more sustained domestic support than is possible, makes excessive demands on intelligence, places too much faith in democracy, and is overly ambitious. It will, however, be difficult to construct a replacement foreign policy.
Foreign Policy Dilemmas and Opportunities for a New Administration: An Opinion Piece, Robert Jervis
America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century, William C. Wohlforth and Stephen G. Brooks Reviewed by Robert Jervis
Understanding the Bush Doctrine: Preventive Wars and Regime Change , Robert Jervis
Introduction: Presidential Elections and Foreign Policy, Robert Jervis
Obama’s War on ISIS: But What Does This Mean?, Robert Jervis
more by this authorJoin the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
WEBINAR
Immigration: Myths, Realities, and the Future
June 17, 2021
Revisiting the New Deal
What the New Deal Did
David M. Kennedy
Franklin D. Roosevelt and The Transcendence of Partisan Politics
Sidney M. Milkis
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson
view additional issuesArticles | Book reviews
 |
PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRACY |
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.
