In this book, Anne M. Kornhauser chronicles how sympathetic, liberal critics of the modern administrative state confronted tensions they saw in the “statist liberal project” of the mid-twentieth century (p. 2). The book focuses on the liberals who were most concerned not with the size and scope of modern administrative government but with how its new functions would be carried out. Kornhauser alleges that they, not conservatives who rejected the very premise of a more robust state, were the most insightful thinkers regarding the problem of modern administrative power.
After sketching the ongoing controversy over the administrative state’s legitimacy, Debating the American State thoroughly and somewhat laboriously describes three attempts to grapple with the problem. The first, undertaken by scholars of law and social science during the New Deal, sought to preserve the rule of law and democracy in the face of the administrative state’s appeal to efficiency, emergency politics, and technocratic expertise. Through procedural safeguards and participation in administrative government, they sought to make the administrative state democratic and accountable. The second encounter came when critical liberals, particularly German émigrés, confronted the tension between administrative governance and the rule of law in light o
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
On Democracy: Remembering Demetrios James Caraley
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRACY
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.