This book investigates a less studied area of scholarship: how formal international security institutions often rely on informal processes and how informal institutions establish connections with formal ones. It focuses on the great powers—the five permanent members (P5) of the United Nations Security Council (USNC) and the G7/G8—and rising middle and second-tier great powers (for example, those occupying the rotating seats of the UNSC and the other G20 states) and concludes that as these institutions interact and inter sect, they are self-correcting and mutually beneficial.
The book assumes that multilateralism declines in utility after the mid-1990s because of the lack of progress in trade, UNSC reform, and climate and the BRIC states’ dissatisfaction with their roles and power. In addition, Western-oriented institutions are no longer meeting great power expectations or providing the prestige sought by rising powers.
Kjell Engelbrekt studies how formal multilateral institutions such as the UNSC and minilateral ones such as the P5 intersect with informal institutions such as the multilateral United Nations General Assembly opening session and “GX” summitry. The book first examines whether the powers integrate or separate formal and informal institutions and processes. Second, it tracks how institutional roles evolve in
To continue reading, see options above.
Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order, Gerry Simpson Reviewed by David A. Deese
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
The Powell Doctrine
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.