Why do some military coups succeed and others fail? Why do some armed interventions give rise to democracies, while others establish authoritarian regimes? These are two of the intriguing questions posed by Yaprak Gürsoy in Between Military Rule and Democracy. To answer them, Gürsoy undertakes a comparative historical analysis of Greece and Turkey—two countries rarely paired for comparison despite such important similarities as their shared Ottoman heritage and their common location on the political and geographic periphery of Europe and the Middle East. The Greece-Turkey comparison provides “4 periods of authoritarianism, 6 periods of democracy, 10 short-lived coups with different degrees of success”—in short, an abundance of regime and coup outcomes that together create a “natural laboratory” for the exploration of competing explanatory hypotheses regarding these phenomena (p. 4).
Gürsoy's theoretical inspiration is drawn from Robert Dahl's canonical work Polyarchy and his argument that democracy is most likely to emerge when elites calculate that the costs of tolerating the opposition outweigh the costs of suppressing it. Gürsoy embraces Dahl's logic but offers to improve upon it by folding in the role of another independent factor—the military and its procli
To continue reading, see options above.
Networked Publics and Digital Contention: The Politics of Everyday Life in Tunisia, Mohamed Zayani Reviewed by EVA BELLIN
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Ukraine, Russia, and the West
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
CURRENT PERSPECTIVES ON AMERICAN POLITICS
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.