Share this
PREVIOUS ARTICLE ALL CONTENTS Next ARTICLE

The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy: Why Strategic Superiority Matters, Matthew Kroenig

Reviewed by James J. Wirtz

BUY

 

According to Cold War folklore, nuclear war was un-winnable. That myth is not accurate. Not only is nuclear war winnable, the United States actually won a nuclear war against Japan. Many observers, however, object to this line of reasoning. They believe that using nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear opponent is not nuclear war because the opponent cannot return fire with nuclear weapons. But this objection misses the fundamental point – just as long as the opponent does not return nuclear fire, either because they lack the capability or because their weapons are destroyed completely in a splendid first strike, nuclear war can be won. The “fine print” associated with this proposition, however, is that the side contemplating victory has to go nuclear first and must be prepared to “get their hair mussed,” to paraphrase General Buck Turgidson, if things do not unfold as planned.

It is also true that as the situation of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) emerged by the mid-1970s, hopes of limiting damage in an all-out Soviet-American nuclear exchange, not to mention achieving a splendid first strike, faded in policy and academic circles. When both sides possessed a large secure second-strike capability, the difference in the damage suffered between those firing first or second in a nuclear exchange became insignificant, despite the clai

To continue reading, see options above.

More by This Author

The Politics of Weapons Inspections: Assessing WMD Monitoring and Verification Regimes, Nathan E. Busch and Joseph F. Pilat Reviewed by James J. Wirtz

The Statebuilder's Dilemma: On the Limits of Foreign Intervention, David A. Lake Reviewed by James J. Wirtz

The Global Village Myth: Distance, War, and the Limits of Power, Patrick Porter Reviewed by James J. Wirtz

The Rise and Fall of Intelligence: An International Security History, Michael Warner Reviewed by James J. Wirtz

more by this author

About PSQ's Editor

Demetrios James Caraley

Full Access

Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.

Editor’s spotlight

The Watergate Briefs

Separation of Powers and Executive Privilege: The Watergate Briefs
Demetrios James Caraley and Frances Penn

Search the Archives

Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilson

view additional issues

Most read

Articles | Book reviews

Understanding the Bush Doctrine
Robert Jervis

The Study of Administration
Woodrow Wilson

Notes on Roosevelt's "Quarantine" Speech
Dorothy Borg

view all

New APS Book

THE PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS: Extending the U.S. Umbrella and Increasing Chances of War   THE PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS: EXTENDING THE U.S. UMBRELLA AND INCREASING CHANCES OF WAR

CONFERENCES & EVENTS

The Greater Good Gathering: Technology, Community, and the Greater Good
February 6–7, 2019
New York, NY

The Greater Good Gathering conference explored the future of public policy and how best to advance the greater good in the 21st century in light of technological innovation, economic disruption, ideological polarization, and governance challenges.

MORE ABOUT THIS EVENT VIEW ALL EVENTS

About US

Academy of Political Science

The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.

Political Science Quarterly

With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.

Stay Connected

newsstand locator
About APS