Michael J. Faber places the Anti-Federalists at center stage in the intellectual and political drama that was the debate over the ratification of the Constitution. In doing so, he offers a thorough, useful resource for learning about the ideas, arguments, rhetoric, and experiences of Anti-Federalists in particular places and at particular moments during the ratification debates. The book culminates with the explication of a hypothetical “Anti-Federalist Constitution,” a helpful thought experiment that imagines the concrete document that the Anti-Federalists may have produced, given the opportunity.
Faber’s conceptual innovation is to distinguish the opponents of the Constitution as Rights, Power, or Democratic Anti-Federalists. Rights Anti-Federalists, he writes, were “focused on the individual and the potential for governmental tyranny,” stressing “the absence of a bill of rights” (pp. ix, 25). Power Anti-Federalists were “the truest federalists in the debate”; they “were less concerned about the people as individuals” and more concerned about the distribution of powers, both within the national government and between the national and state governments (pp. ix, x, 25). Democratic Anti-Federalists were more radically committed to the people’s direct role in their government than their peers
To continue reading, see options above.
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Voting and the Electorate
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRACY
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.