It is a common complaint among scholars of international relations that the United States lacks an overarching grand strategy. At least since the end of the Cold War, the argument goes, U.S. leaders have failed to put in place a grand strategic design suited to the modern era, leading to ambivalence over the proper ends and means of U.S. foreign policy. As a result, the United States is adrift on the world stage.
In Emergent Strategy and Grand Strategy, Ionut Popescu tackles this conventional wisdom that the United States is hamstrung in foreign policy as long as it lacks a grand strategy. Popescu argues that while it is true that some past presidents crafted foreign policy choices on the basis of fixed designs (grand strategy), others allowed their approach to evolve in response to political conditions at home and abroad (emergent strategy). In this book, Popescu offers an evaluation of these opposite models of decision-making: does the United States enjoy more success when its leaders adhere to set plans or when they remain open to adaptation?
Overall, Popescu finds that “while both models of decision-making have had positive results at different times, neither one is able to consistently lead to successful strategic performance” (p. 166). At first glance, this might appear an unsatisfying contribution around
To continue reading, see options above.
American Pendulum: Recurring Debates in U.S. Grand Strategy, Christopher Hemmer Reviewed by PETER HARRIS
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
The Powell Doctrine
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.