The title of Derek Leebaert’s sprawling book signals its intent to depart from orthodoxy. Missing are allusions to a “Special Relationship,” Britain’s retreat from Empire, or even the Cold War. The concept of America confronting a superpower other than the Soviet Union is jarring.
By titling his book in such an iconoclastic way, Leebaert will provoke some readers to read another book on Anglo-American relations in the aftermath of World War II. This is no mean feat. There are already enough of these in print to fill multiple bookcases. For the decade-plus that Leebaert examines, stretching from Yalta, Potsdam, and Hiroshima through Suez, Hungary, and Sputnik, not a great many new archives have been declassified. So the question is, should a reader wade through his more than 500 pages of text and almost 70 pages of notes?
The answer is a qualified yes. Leebaert misleads when, using William Fox’s 1944 definition of superpower—“great power plus great mobility of power” (p. 6)—he claims that only Britain qualified after World War II, whereas as late as 1950, the United States was a “superstate, not a superpower” (p. 254). But he is correct to highlight that America replaced Pax Britannica with Pax Americana reluctantly and incrementally. Both London and Washington exaggerated British capab
To continue reading, see options above.
In the Shadow of the Cold War: American Foreign Policy from George Bush Sr. to Donald Trump, Timothy J. Lynch Reviewed by Richard Immerman
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
The Powell Doctrine
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.