Television Coverage of Presidential Conventions: Now You See It, Now You Don't
David L. Paletz and Martha Elson review various criticisms of the kind of coverage television gives to presidential nominating conventions. Examining 1972 data, the authors conclude that given the nature of television coverage, the nominees of divisive conventions are disadvantaged later at the polls.
The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System, Richard Davis Reviewed by David L. Paletz
Television News and the Supreme Court, Elliot E. Slotnick and Jennifer A. Segal Reviewed by David L. Paletz
Becoming Citizens in the Age of Television: How Americans Challenged the Media and Seized Political Initiative during the Iran-Contra Debate, David Thelen Reviewed by David L. Paletz
The Journalism of Outrage: Investigative Reporting and Agenda Building in America, David L. Protess Reviewed by David L. Paletz
The Battle for Public Opinion: The President, the Press, and the Polls During Watergate, Kurt Lang and Gladys Engel Lang Reviewed by David L. Paletzmore by this author
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Ukraine, Russia, and the West
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PERSPECTIVES ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1992–2020
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.