In his book, Steve A. Yetiv establishes that recurrent cognitive biases have consistently undermined the quality of U.S. foreign policy decisions. He examines a diverse set of contemporary cases, focused in and around the Middle East, to demonstrate the influence of one or more of a full set of deleterious psychological tendencies. Yetiv is forthright about the purposes of this small volume. He concedes that he is not breaking new intellectual ground, testing propositions against competing arguments, or selecting cases for their representativeness. Instead, he seeks to introduce the essential vocabulary and arguments of an important theory of foreign policy to a broad audience.
Each chapter has a different thematic focus and historical case. The Afghanistan chapter focuses on the bias by which parties see their own behavior as transparently virtuous, in contrast to an opponent’s behavior; the Iran‐Contra chapter centers on the tunnel vision behind the Ronald Reagan administration’s efforts to trade guns to Iran to secure release of U.S. hostages and obtain cash to fund the Contras in Nicaragua; the Iraq chapter centers on overconfidence in the George W. Bush administration’s 2003 rush to war
To continue reading, see options above.
Reconceptualizing Deterrence: Nudging Toward Rationality in Middle East Rivalries, Elli Lieberman Reviewed by James H. Lebovic
American Soldiers in Iraq: McSoldiers or Innovative Professionals?, Morten G. Ender Reviewed by James H. Lebovic
Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East, Etel Solingen Reviewed by James H. Lebovic
Beyond Nuclear Thinking, Robert W. Malcolmson Reviewed by James H. Lebovic
Join the Academy of Political Science and automatically receive Political Science Quarterly.
Publishing since 1886, PSQ is the most widely read and accessible scholarly journal with distinguished contributors such as: Lisa Anderson, Robert A. Dahl, Samuel P. Huntington, Robert Jervis, Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Theda Skocpol, Woodrow Wilsonview additional issues
Articles | Book reviews
PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION AND DEMOCRACY
The Academy of Political Science, promotes objective, scholarly analyses of political, social, and economic issues. Through its conferences and publications APS provides analysis and insight into both domestic and foreign policy issues.
With neither an ideological nor a partisan bias, PSQ looks at facts and analyzes data objectively to help readers understand what is really going on in national and world affairs.